Welcome
Intro and Vision
people
Organization
HK Center for Northeast Asian Studies
Institutions in Partnership
  home  >  ABOUT ARI  >  HK Center for Northeast Asian Studies  >  Research Agenda

 At present, the rising significance of international relations has been accompanied not only by globalization but also by the transnational trend. No exception is Northeast Asia which is experiencing a complicated mixture of conflicting factors like the co-existence of the legacies from the cold-war era and the present post-cold war phenomena, and the parallel between modernization and post-modernization. A variety of agents—states, local governments, varied NGOs, corporations, and individuals—have been engaging in this transitional trend in almost all areas, ranging from capital, economy, and labor, to theoretical, ideological, cultural, and environmental and human rights-related issues, which leads to the phenomenon of “porous borders.” Currently, Northeast Asia is experiencing the formation, transformation, and reformation of multilayered networks and multiple identities among various agents.

 In order to provide a comprehensive account of complicated transnational phenomena in Northeast Asia, it is essential to explore the intellectual foundations underlying them, to examine transnational social and cultural trends, and to investigate the changes in institutional orders. The Asiatic Research Institute (henceforth, ARI), Korea University, set up three research divisions, each dealing with one of the aforementioned three—intellectual, socio-cultural, and institutional—topics. These three divisions are cooperating with each other to extend our horizon regarding the past, present, and future of Northeast Asia. Based on reflective examinations of existing research on Northeast Asia, ARI is viewing it as “Transnational Space,” investigating both conflicts together with cooperation as well as similarities and differences among the Northeast Asian countries, and will search for an alternative vision for order in this region. 

  

The following describes the research objectives of each division of the ARI's Humanities Korea Project.

1) Outline

 

The Division of Thoughts puts focus on explaining the transnational trend in Northeast Asia through exploring its intellectual foundations. In order to deeply understand the possibility of, as well as the limit of, the formation of Northeast Asian regional community, it is indispensable to scrutinize the connections between the collective identities of the past and those of the present constituted by the mixture of varied individual, national, and international elements. For contemporary Northeast Asia is a dynamic space in which, owing to increasing transnational exchanges, a variety of identities are being expressed. 

 

2) Objectives

 

 The Division of Thoughts addresses the following three topics, thus illuminating the intellectual foundations of Northeast Asian transnational space: (1) Understanding of Human Being at the Individual Level, (2) Collective Consciousness at the Social Dimension, and (3) Transnational Identities at the International Level.

  

(1) Understanding of Human Being at the Individual Level

This task is from a comparative cultural perspective, to reconstruct various understandings of human being characteristic of the Northeast Asian traditions. The specific objectives are as follows: (1) analyzing common features as well as differences with regard to understandings of human being in a comparative method, which are expressed and/or articulated in intellectual and religious traditions like Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism; (2) examining the continuities as well as changes in relation to understandings of human being after the influx of the Western civilizations; and (3) ultimately offering a comprehensive epistemological framework in which to explore the regional identities of Northeast Asia .


(2) Collective Consciousness at the Social Dimension

This task is from a comparative cultural perspective, to reconstruct various understandings of human being characteristic of the Northeast Asian traditions. The specific objectives are as follows: (1) analyzing common features as well as differences with regard to understandings of human being in a comparative method, which are expressed and/or articulated in intellectual and religious traditions like Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism; (2) examining the continuities as well as changes in relation to understandings of human being after the influx of the Western civilizations; and (3) ultimately offering a comprehensive epistemological framework in which to explore the regional identities of Northeast Asia . 



(3) Transnational Identities at the International Level
This task is to test the viability of Northeast Asian transnational space through investigating the Northeast Asian intellectual origins which may provide underpinnings to construct transnational identities. The specific objectives are as follows: (1) exploring the intellectual and religious foundations of Northeast Asian civilizations like Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism with which to form Northeast Asian transnational identities; (2) studying Pan-Asianism which emerged during the early modern period to the present discourses on Northeast Asian community from a comparative perspective, and (3) ultimately offering a practical model in which to envision and realize Northeast Asian transnational space for the future.

 

 

 1) Outline

The Division of Societies and Cultures historically investigates transnational social and cultural phenomena, explores their current state, and provides a prospect for their future developments. On this basis, the division will ultimately propose multicultural policies and programs for promoting the symbiotic flourishing of Northeast Asian community. This work is inspired by the observation that various transnational networks and communities as well as multicultural phenomena have been brought about as a consequence of the drastic increase of international migrations and the exchange of human resources as well as pop-cultures. In order to comprehensively examine such transnational socio-cultural phenomena, it is necessary to undertake interdisciplinary studies including cultural anthropology, history, sociology, and geography. 

2) Objectives

The Division of Societies and Cultures undertakes the following three tasks: (1) Migrations and the Exchange of Human Resources, (2) Networks and Communities, and (3) Cultural Exchange and Multi-cultures.

(1) Migrations and the Exchange of Human Resources

This task is to analyze transnational phenomena in relation to international migrations and the exchange of human recourses as well as sociocultural issues in this regard. The specific objectives are as follows: (1) Investigating the history of Diasporas; (2) exploring the current state of the exchange of human resources and their sociocultural impacts; and (3) analyzing national policies of each country on a wide range of issues concerning social integration.



(2) Networks and Communities
This task is to investigate the unique features and characteristic structures of various ethnic, civil, and cyber networks which have been created among individuals, societies, and nations in Northeast Asia. The specific objectives are as follows: (1) Exploring the historical courses in which ethnic networks and communities were shaped in early modern Northeast Asia; (2) examining the formations as well as the characteristics of civil and cyber networks and communities; and (3) offering, on this basis, both a vision for the future of transnational networks and communities and a Northeast Asian model for it.



(3) Cultural Exchanges and Multi-cultures
This task is to investigate the structures and unique features of the past and current cultural exchanges, to explore the similarities as well as the differences observed among the attitudes of each country towards multicultural phenomena, and to examine the possibility of theorizations of transnational multicultural societies. The specific objectives are as follows: (1) Carrying out extensive research on the transnational cultural exchanges in Northeast Asia during the early modern period; (2) analyzing the unique features of contemporary cultural exchanges and multicultural societies as well as their cultural fusions; and (3) undertaking a theoretical reflection on the possibility of symbiotic flourishing of transnational and multicultural societies as well as its related educational programs. The division also intends to investigate the relationship between the drastically increasing capitalization of culture and the future of cultural exchanges in Northeast Asia.

1) Outline
 The Division of Institutions analyzes the transnational modality of Northeast Asian order through the lens of history and current regional dynamics. On this basis, this division will search for a practicable scheme to institutionally secure the regional order— of peace and mutual prosperity—for Northeast Asia in the future. In order to theoretically and empirically analyze the multilayered and intricate regional dynamics of transnational Northeast Asia, it is required both to examine the order in Northeast Asia from the diverse perspectives of history, economy, and diplomacy for security and to carry out research in each field at the three consecutive stages—its formations in the past, its current dynamics, and the prospect for its future.
2) Objectives
The Division of Institutions undertakes the following three tasks in order to analyze the course of institutionalization of the transnational order in Northeast Asia, particularly focusing on history, economy, and politics: (1) The Formation of Transnational Order in the History of Northeast Asia, (2) Economic Exchanges and Institutional Integration, and (3) the Dynamics of Northeast Asian Transnational International Order and a Blueprint for Realizing its Institutionalization.

(1) A Historical Reflection on the Formation of Northeast Asian Transnational Order
This task is to envision Northeast Asian transnational order in the future through exploring its past and present. The specific objectives are as follows: (1) Examining the historical contexts and legacies of Northeast Asian order in the past;  (2) comparing the diverse perceptions of the past held by each country, which have exerted and continue to exert tremendous influence over the formation of Northeast Asian transnational order, and (3) offering a prospect for future Northeast Asian transnational order through searching for a historical perspective alternative to the nation-centered, therefore mutually conflicting, perceptions of Northeast Asian history.



(2) Economic Exchanges and Institutional Integration 
This task is to carry out a survey of activities of multinational corporations, the flow of capital, and exchanges as well as circulation of commodities and services, and on this basis to examine the conditions in which to resolve conflicts over interests among the countries so as to construct a symbiotic economic order. The specific objectives are as follows: (1) Analyzing the networks of Northeast Asian capitals and communities after the WWII; (2) exploring what impacts the growth of transnational economic exchanges accompanied by globalization brought to the mutual recognitions among the peoples in this region; and  (3) searching for a constructive scheme for institutionalizing Northeast Asian economic cooperation and integration by means of analyzing central issues relating to the institutionalization of current Northeast Asian economic cooperative organizations such as FTA, AMF, ASEAN+3, APEC, etc.




(3) The Dynamics of Northeast Asian Transnational international Order and a Blueprint for Realizing its Institutionalization
This task is to review the dynamics during the transition from the beginning of the early modern international order to the present transnational political order and on this basis to offer a vision for the future. The specific objectives are as follows: (1) analyzing Northeast Asian international order as well as its institutional uniqueness observed in their conflict and cooperation during the period between the early modern times and the emergence of globalization; (2) examining the current dynamics of the transnational order of this region and varied perceptions of it by each country; and thereby offering a framework to structure the governance of transnational space as well as to institutionalize international cooperation.  

 



 
Copyright 2008 Asiatic Research Institute.,Ltd. All rights reserved. Contact webmaster for more information
TEL : 02-3290-1600 / FAX : 02-923-4661 / email : ari@asiaticresearch.org
Producer Ncom Communication Corp